Home > Jewish Fundamentalism, Settler Violence, West Bank Law Enforcement > Settler Rabbi publishes “The complete guide to killing non-Jews” — UPDATED

Settler Rabbi publishes “The complete guide to killing non-Jews” — UPDATED

LATEST UPDATE — August 30 2010: Max Blumenthal reports from a conference supporting the rabbi (older updates at bottom.)

The ultra-fundamentalist Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar is infamous for its involvement in settler violence against Palestinians. Memorably, one of the students fired a homemade “Kassam” rocket at the neighboring village of Burin in June 2008. This morning, Maariv reports that the Yeshiva’s dean has just published on the proscribed dos and don’ts (mainly the former) regarding the killing of gentiles. Here are some choice excerpts.


“In any situation in which a non-Jew’s presence endangers Jewish lives, the non-Jew may be killed even if he is a righteous Gentile and not at all guilty for the situation that has been created…When a non-Jew assists a murderer of Jews and causes the death of one, he may be killed, and in any case where a non-Jew’s presence causes danger to Jews, the non-Jew may be killed…The [Din Rodef] dispensation applies even when the pursuer is not threatening to kill directly, but only indirectly…Even a civilian who assists combat fighters is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Anyone who assists the army of the wicked in any way is strengthening murderers and is considered a pursuer. A civilian who encourages the war gives the king and his soldiers the strength to continue. Therefore, any citizen of the state that opposes us who encourages the combat soldiers or expresses satisfaction over their actions is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Also, anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer…Hindrances—babies are found many times in this situation. They block the way to rescue by their presence and do so completely by force. Nevertheless, they may be killed because their presence aids murder. There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”…In a chapter entitled “Deliberate harm to innocents,” the book explains that war is directled mainly against the pursuers, but those who belong to the enemy nation are also considered the enemy because they are assisting murderers.

A full translation of the Maariv article can be read after the jump.

The complete guide to killing non-Jews

Roi Sharon, Maariv, November 9 2009 [page 2 with front page teaser]

When is it permissible to kill non-Jews? The book Torat ha-Melekh [The King’s Teaching], which was just published, was written by Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, the dean of the Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in the community of Yitzhar near Nablus, together with another rabbi from the yeshiva, Yossi Elitzur. The book contains no fewer than 230 pages on the laws concerning the killing of non-Jews, a kind of guide for anyone who ponders the question of if and when it is permissible to take the life of a non-Jew.

Although the book is not being distributed by the leading book companies, it has already received warm recommendations from right-wing elements, including recommendations from important rabbis such as Yitzhak Ginsburg, Dov Lior and Yaakov Yosef, that were printed at the beginning of the book. The book is being distributed via the Internet and through the yeshiva, and at this stage the introductory price is NIS 30 per copy. At the memorial ceremony that was held over the weekend in Jerusalem for Rabbi Meir Kahane, who was killed nineteen years ago, copies of the book were sold.

Throughout the book, the authors deal with in-depth theoretical questions in Jewish religious law regarding the killing of non-Jews. The words “Arabs” and “Palestinians” are not mentioned even indirectly, and the authors are careful to avoid making explicit statements in favor of an individual taking the law into his own hands. The book includes hundreds of sources from the Bible and religious law. The book includes quotes from Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, one of the fathers of religious Zionism, and from Rabbi Shaul Yisraeli, one of the deans of the Mercaz Harav Yeshiva, the stronghold of national-religious Zionism that is located in Jerusalem.

The book opens with a prohibition against killing non-Jews and justifies it, among other things, on the grounds of preventing hostility and any desecration of God’s name. But very quickly, the authors move from prohibition to permission, to the various dispensations for harming non-Jews, with the central reason being their obligation to uphold the seven Noahide laws, which every human being on earth must follow. Among these commandments are prohibitions on theft, bloodshed and idolatry. [The seven Noahide laws prohibit idolatry, murder, theft, illicit sexual relations, blasphemy and eating the flesh of a live animal, and require societies to institute just laws and law courts]

“When we approach a non-Jew who has violated the seven Noahide laws and kill him out of concern for upholding these seven laws, no prohibition has been violated,” states the book, which emphasizes that killing is forbidden unless it is done in obedience to a court ruling. But later on, the authors limit the prohibition, noting that it applies only to a “proper system that deals with non-Jews who violate the seven Noahide commandments.”

The book includes another conclusion that explains when a non-Jew may be killed even if he is not an enemy of the Jews. “In any situation in which a non-Jew’s presence endangers Jewish lives, the non-Jew may be killed even if he is a righteous Gentile and not at all guilty for the situation that has been created,” the authors state. “When a non-Jew assists a murderer of Jews and causes the death of one, he may be killed, and in any case where a non-Jew’s presence causes danger to Jews, the non-Jew may be killed.”

One of the dispensations for killing non-Jews, according to religious law, applies in a case of din rodef [the law of the “pursuer,” according to which one who is pursuing another with murderous intent may be killed extrajudicially] even when the pursuer is a civilian. “The dispensation applies even when the pursuer is not threatening to kill directly, but only indirectly,” the book states. “Even a civilian who assists combat fighters is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Anyone who assists the army of the wicked in any way is strengthening murderers and is considered a pursuer. A civilian who encourages the war gives the king and his soldiers the strength to continue. Therefore, any citizen of the state that opposes us who encourages the combat soldiers or expresses satisfaction over their actions is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Also, anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer.”

Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur determine that children may also be harmed because they are “hindrances.” The rabbis write as follows: “Hindrances—babies are found many times in this situation. They block the way to rescue by their presence and do so completely by force. Nevertheless, they may be killed because their presence aids murder. There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”

In addition, the children of the leader may be harmed in order to apply pressure to him. If attacking the children of a wicked ruler will influence him not to behave wickedly, they may be harmed. “It is better to kill the pursuers than to kill others,” the authors state.

In a chapter entitled “Deliberate harm to innocents,” the book explains that war is directly mainly against the pursuers, but those who belong to the enemy nation are also considered the enemy because they are assisting murderers.

Retaliation also has a place and purpose in this book by Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur. “In order to defeat the enemy, we must behave toward them in a spirit of retaliation and measure for measure,” they state. “Retaliation is absolutely necessary in order to render such wickedness not worthwhile. Therefore, sometimes we do cruel deeds in order to create the proper balance of terror.”

In one of the footnotes, the two rabbis write in such a way that appears to permit individuals to act on their own, outside of any decision by the government or the army.

“A decision by the nation is not necessary to permit shedding the blood of the evil kingdom,” the rabbis write. “Even individuals from the nation being attacked may harm them.”

Unlike books of religious law that are published by yeshivas, this time the rabbis added a chapter containing the book’s conclusions. Each of the six chapters is summarized into main points of several lines, which state, among other things: “In religious law, we have found that non-Jews are generally suspected of shedding Jewish blood, and in war, this suspicion becomes a great deal stronger. One must consider killing even babies, who have not violated the seven Noahide laws, because of the future danger that will be caused if they are allowed to grow up to be as wicked as their parents.”

Even though the authors are careful, as stated, to use the term “non-Jews,” there are certainly those who could interpret the nationality of the “non-Jews” who are liable to endanger the Jewish people. This is strengthened by the leaflet “The Jewish Voice,” which is published on the Internet from Yitzhar, which comments on the book: “It is superfluous to note that nowhere in the book is it written that the statements are directly only to the ancient non-Jews.” The leaflet’s editors did not omit a stinging remark directed at the GSS, who will certainly take the trouble to get themselves a copy. “The editors suggest to the GSS that they award the prize for Israel’s security to the authors,” the leaflet states, “who gave the detectives the option of reading the summarized conclusions without any need for in-depth study of the entire book.”

One student of the Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in Yitzhar explained, from his point of view, where Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur got the courage to speak so freely on a subject such as the killing of non-Jews. “The rabbis aren’t afraid of prosecution because in that case, Maimonides [Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, 1135–1204] and Nahmanides [Rabbi Moses ben Nahman, 1194–1270] would have to stand trial too, and anyway, this is research on religious law,” the yeshiva student said. “In a Jewish state, nobody sits in jail for studying Torah.”

UPDATES

  • November 12 2009 — Glenn Greenwald has a good comparative analysis of Muslim, Christian and Jewish fundamentalist terror and Jim Sleeper blasts critics of the Ft. Hood massacre who choose to ignore Jewish fundamentalist terror.
  • November 13, 2009 —  JJ Goldberg points out that you can’t tell all Rabbis by the company they keep, Richard Silverstein sees the connection between this publication and the Jewish terrorist Jack Teitel and MJ Rosenberg blasts Krauthammer for selectively attaching religion to terrorism.
  • November 14, 2009 — Ori Nir provides a useful catalog of Jewish terrorist activity 1978. I would argue that the he should have included the many incidents over the past few years, some of which have resulted in loss of life, that settlers have used the “Price Tag” tactic — violent attacks on Palestinians aimed at to deterring the IDF. This is is terrorism in the narrow definition of the term.
  • November 15, 2009 — Brig. Gen. Avichai Rontzki, IDF Chief Rabbi and a resident of the West Bank settlement of Itamar told settler soldiers last Thursday that ‘troops who show mercy to enemy will be damned.’ Lara Friedman provides a comprehensive backgrounder on Ronztki and his fundamentalist influence on the IDF.  Richard Silverstein draws parallels in religious motivation between recently apprehended settler terrorist Jack Teitel and Nidal Malik Hasan, the instigator of the Ft. Hood massacre.
  • November 16, 2009 — Avrum Burg on how this kind of Judaism inspires murder: “”Just go to a synagogue on Sabbath eve.  Go in and pick up the weekly Parasha [Torah portion] commentary pages, read them and you will see that Teitel is not alone.  Teitel is just one of an entire plantation of bad weed.  Some of those pages are actually financed by the state, through the Ministry of Religious Affairs.  The racist lore, as taught by the rabbis of Hebron and Bet El, is everywhere.  In the end, someone gets up and does the deed.  We tend to ignore this, but horrible things happen there.  It is in the air.  I know those people.  Some of them are my relatives.  They do terrible things and we fail to notice.”
  • November 19, 2009 — Haaretz’s Akiva Eldar, based on Yesh Din data, reveals that the Rabbi’s Yeshiva is funded by the Israeli government.
  • December 6 2009 — Rabbi Elitzur and Ode Yosef Hai Yeshiva lead preparations for terrorizing West Bank Palestinians.
  • December 15 2009 — Haaretz uncovers US federal tax exemptions for American charities funding the rabbi.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

  1. Ryan
    November 11, 2009 at 03:53

    Ahh yes!
    Gods chosen people.

  2. November 11, 2009 at 06:09

    When one can make you believe absurdities, one can make you commit atrocities.
    -Voltaire-

    • Isaiah62
      February 21, 2010 at 20:54

      When one can make you believe absurdities, one can make you commit atrocities.

      definition 0f ISLAM

      • April 12, 2010 at 23:38

        It seems to me that anyone who would like to find an excuse to hate can do so for Jews by reading this outrageous drivel.

        Imagine it is reversed and we can imagine Israel would vanish in a puff of indignant smoke, men, women, children and rabbis all who assist the violence of the IDF, no matter what the IDF’s justification may be.

  3. daMamma
    November 12, 2009 at 19:39

    Not exactly a good neighbor is he?

  4. Sperry
    November 17, 2009 at 07:40

    Why do we use our differences to dehumanize each other? To try and justify that we (whoever “we” happens to be– jew, christian, muslim), above other human beings, are better than, more worthy, of higher creation, “chosen” by “god” more than any other person who walks the earth? We are like little children battling each other for a parent’s attention. When professed in the twisted manner as Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira does, religion becomes the highest expression of humanity’s self-hatred. The only true way, no matter what religion a person believes in, is through practicing love, forgiveness, mercy, and compassion.
    “Hate is also creative…it creates more hate.”

  5. Behnam
    November 17, 2009 at 10:16

    Compared to this guy, Bin Laden is a saint. Bin Laden accepts the killing of babies only as collateral damage (like Americans).

  6. JacquesF
    November 18, 2009 at 14:17

    One has to be a raving lunatic to believe this kind of malicious “religious” crap.
    All this babbling about being the “Chosen” ones and therefore having the right to kill whomever may pose a threat to these converted Khazars, must be locked up in a mental hospital aka nut-hut. This luny megalomaniac is a danger to his own people and doesn’t even realise this. How stupid can one be!

    • December 17, 2009 at 19:43

      Nice argumentation, if you would only leave out the “converted Khazars” thing, this lowers your holy outrage in many respects.

    • EL BUITRE
      January 29, 2011 at 04:06

      and yet Neteyahu and all Israeli officials said nothing.what Israeli was ever punished for killing an Arab?..here in America we believe you make heroes of jews that destroy mosques.is it not in the Torah?

  7. Rick
    December 3, 2009 at 21:13

    Ryan, The referred to material is from a fringe group that already has violent tendencies – this book is just another step down their path. I’m sure the IRA and other nationalist & liberation movements have had their own violent factions. Converting them to a path of peace requires changing the situation around them.

    JacquesF, the folks babbling about ‘chosen ones’ are not jews. Also, the majority of israelis are non-european in appearance, and even the european-appearing israelis can be liked by DNA to their israelite ancestors. But, you already knew this.

  8. December 7, 2009 at 17:37

    So every country outside Israel now has these guys on a no entry list of some kind right? I mean there’s no chance these nutjobs could come over here is there?

    • December 17, 2009 at 19:45

      You have a number of similiar folks in your hometown, for sure. Think about it. And some thousands in your country. Each nation has them, somehow.

  9. jim
    December 8, 2009 at 16:21

    Ban God, he’ll be the death of us all.

    • December 17, 2009 at 19:44

      Lol any suggestion how you’d do this?

  10. December 17, 2009 at 19:57

    I agree on the fact that civilians encouraging fighters to fight against are called supporters and I agree on the fact that children of wicked parents will in many cases grow wicked and stay that for at least a period of time. I agree that civilians helping people who intend to kill take part in this killing.
    I agree on the fact that people not keeping the 7 Noahide laws are somehow considered sinful and often evil.

    I DO NOT agree on that Jews are made for the job to rule and judge over this. I DO NOT agree on that Jews are the ones to deliberately determine who is evil and act as G-d’s “arranged killers” to enforce His law on the whole world. As it is said “you may not worship stars and moons because I’ve given them to the people of the earth but I am your G-d” (Leviticus or Numeri).

    I DO NOT agree on that Jews or any other may determine what children will become in future from viewing them nowadays : why? Because G-d himself ruled that His punishment will be introduced on sin, neither on planning nor on the potential of sin; nor will children be made accountable on their parents’ sins.

    It’s all in the Torah.
    As you might realize or know, everything is a question of who and why and how to interprete. Everything ultimately good may be misused for the worst in the world.
    I am a Jew, an orthodox one. I am not sure whether you might have thought of me rejecting the madness above… ?..

    • Solomon
      January 7, 2010 at 18:44

      Why doesn’t everyone throw out that fictional storybook “The Torah”? God did not write it. Some old man did. If that old man heard the voice of God then I say it was Alzheimer’s….

    • jon
      November 4, 2010 at 13:26

      Well said Orthodox Jew guy. Let God do the judging.

  11. Patrick
    January 16, 2010 at 22:54

    Tit-For-Tat

    “In any situation in which a Jew’s presence endangers non-Jewish lives, the Jew may be killed even if he is a righteous Jew and not at all guilty for the situation that has been created…When a Jew assists a murderer of non-Jews and causes the death of one, he may be killed, and in any case where a Jew’s presence causes danger to non-Jews, the Jew may be killed…The [Din Rodef] dispensation applies even when the pursuer is not threatening to kill directly, but only indirectly…Even a civilian who assists combat fighters is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Anyone who assists the army of the wicked in any way is strengthening murderers and is considered a pursuer. A civilian who encourages the war gives the king and his soldiers the strength to continue. Therefore, any citizen of the state that opposes us who encourages the combat soldiers or expresses satisfaction over their actions is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Also, anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer…Hindrances—babies are found many times in this situation. They block the way to rescue by their presence and do so completely by force. Nevertheless, they may be killed because their presence aids murder. There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”…In a chapter entitled “Deliberate harm to innocents,” the book explains that war is directled mainly against the pursuers, but those who belong to the enemy nation are also considered the enemy because they are assisting murderers.

  12. Doug@usa.com
    January 31, 2010 at 02:16

    In any situation in which the existence of a Jew threatens the life or safety of a non-Jew, the Jew may, and should, be killed. Non-Jewish lives are too important to tolerate the danger posed by Jews.

    • Hamid
      February 3, 2010 at 14:33

      LOL Doug is so obviously a jew. Nice damage control.

  13. Matt
    February 8, 2010 at 08:35

    A few points. First of all, I’m a Jew. Do you really think I therefore beleive in this maniac? People talk about “The Jews” like we are all one people. Are all Christians the same, or Moslems, or Atheists, or whites, blacks,etc.? I know quite a few Jews, they are some of the most charitable, kind, good people I know. I know Moslems too, also kind, generous people, Christians, people of all different colors, and I can find examples of good people among all of them. As far as “The Chosen People” thing, that has been laregly misunderstood. The Jews were “Chosen” to repair the Earth, not chosen as better or anything like that. Just my 2 cents.

    • Thabit
      February 14, 2010 at 09:21

      Was it repairing the earth that the IDF was doing in Gaza? All i have to say is … yer doin a heck ofa job Browny

  14. March 25, 2010 at 15:49

    Zionist freaks like this are NOT rare or strange. Isralike seems desperate to suggest that the rest of the Zionist population are normal human beings, but while their government is blatantly committing repeated war crimes, against anyone who dares to get in their way, it can only be fair to assume they are all dangerous, violent, extremists

  15. denise
    April 13, 2010 at 02:47

    when will we say enough is enough???

  16. Mark Potok
    April 13, 2010 at 05:01

    Is there a similar rule that non-jews can apply to babbling jewish morons living in la-la land?

  17. Patrick Sloan
    April 13, 2010 at 13:46

    Therefore, any citizen of the state that opposes us who encourages the combat soldiers or expresses satisfaction over their actions is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Also, anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer…Hindrances—babies are found many times in this situation. They block the way to rescue by their presence and do so completely by force. Nevertheless, they may be killed because their presence aids murder. There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”…
    This sounds very like the retoric of the Nazi to me do you never learn from history your own people suffered this during the Nazi era and what you are saying is no different.If you think this is the way to be putting your messege forward is it any shock to you that so many people around the world do not support you or ur murderous state.
    You are doing yourself or your people any favours by saying things like this and the more people round the world who heare this bigotry and nonsence the better aand maby more will stand up against the likes of you and your murderous masters.

  18. Ydnar
    April 23, 2010 at 20:41

    Isaiah62 :
    When one can make you believe absurdities, one can make you commit atrocities.
    definition 0f ISLAM

    AND definition of Christianity.
    AND definition of Judaism.
    AND definition of other mythologies that people believe.

  19. May 6, 2010 at 14:30

    I absolutely condemn the views expressed in this book, and also the ludicrous way that Israel is blatantly committing terrible atrocities, war crimes and mass murder, especially since it is being sanctioned, and it appears condoned by the international community.

    Thats my view, but I’m slightly confused about the babies –

    “…They block the way to rescue by their presence and do so completely by force…”

    Exactly how are they blocking the Jews by FORCE ? Do soldiers routinely enter nurserys or maternity wards and find them with rocket launchers and machine guns waiting on the Jews coming? The Jews of course, are forced to massacre them all, in Gods name on their holy crusade, and the worlds press would praise them.

    Its incredible…These people want to kill everyone, including innocents, babies and anyone of another creed, colour or religion, in the name of a being about as real as the tooth fairy, easter bunny or santa clause…

    And anyone who has a bad word to say about the Jews, or criticises them is decried as “Anti-Semitic” and should be pilloried, stoned to death, then hung drawn and quartered. It makes me sick.

    If it wasnt for the Jews and Israel, half the problems in the middle east would be solved, in fact…they created a considerable number of them.

    No doubt I’m now “anti semitic”, and will have Mossad tracking me for the rest of my life, killing my children to change my “wicked views”.

    pfft

  20. May 25, 2010 at 20:50

    SORRY IF I AM AN IGNORANT ‘GOY’ BUT I DON’T KNOW THESE ‘NOAHIDE LAWS’. I AM CURIOUS WHERE TO FIND THEM? AND IF I DON’T KNOW ABOUT THESE ‘NOAHIDE LAWS’ AND INADVERTENTLY BREAK ONE OF THEM (FOR EXAMPLE IN AMERICA, RAW OYSTERS ARE A VERY POPULAR FOOD, BUT THEY ARE LIVE WHEN EATEN, AND I EAT THEM OFTEN…) WILL I BE KILLED BY ONE OF Y-H-W-Y’S ‘CHOSEN PEOPLE’?

    GIVE US AMERICAN GOYIM A BREAK, LET US EAT OUR RAW OYSTERS WITHOUT FEAR OF GETTING BEHEADED, WE PAY 1/3 OF OUR SALARIES SO THAT ISRAEL GETS A $5 BILLION HANDOUT ANNUALLY OF FREE MILITARY STUFF SO THE ‘CHOSEN PEOPLE’ CAN GO SLAUGHTER ‘AMALEK’ AND HIS WOMEN AND CHILDREN…

  21. May 25, 2010 at 20:58

    Matt :… As far as “The Chosen People” thing, that has been laregly misunderstood. The Jews were “Chosen” to repair the Earth, not chosen as better or anything like that. Just my 2 cents…

    It is good to see a Jew who understands that Christians and Muslims are also human, despite what the ‘Tanya’ says, we indeed have souls (spirits?) and laugh and cry just like Jews. Personally, I think the Gaelic Celts are the ‘Chosen People.’ Look at us, we’ve survived all the way to the edges of Europe, and don’t need $5 billion of military aid to survive. Indeed, we are the very embodiment of man’s urge for freedom. And were it not for the Celts coming to America as the Scots-Irish settlers did since 1600s, America would be drinking tea and praising the English queen. Instead we threw off the British yoke, and today we are Israel’s protector. So, as a Celtic ‘Chosen’ person, I hope the Jewish ‘Chosen’ appreciate our welfare handouts to you…

  22. May 28, 2010 at 13:33

    Really awesome post! Truely..

  23. Ed
    June 23, 2010 at 19:11

    Well, it is obvious that so many are still so ignorant of the true history that transpired.

    Many of you making comments know not of what you speak as you support followers of Judaism and worshippers of the Babylonian Talmud. 90 to 95 percent of jewry are Ashkenazim Khazarian mongols and no Jew is of the House of Israel – the Israelites – or of the Tribe of Judah. That is pure bunk put out by Jews but the fact is they have no claim to any land anywhere.

    As for DNA, the Khazarian and Sephardim so-called Jews are the most mixed blood of all, at least until relatively modern times. They are of the bloodline by Cain after Eve mated with Nachash, the whisperer.

    Judaism did not even exist until the Babylonian Talmud was codified in about 500 A.D., centuries after the true Israelites and Judahites (including the House of Benjamin) had left Judah, then called Judea due to John Hyrcanus allowing the defeated Idumeans to become citizens of Judah. The first known Jew was in about 125 to 121 B.C. when Hyrcanus began requiring all Idumean males be circumcized.
    That gave the what became the jews the basis for their myth.

    Now, I don’t give a crap whether you believe me or not, but you will find the definitions in the Encyclopedia Judaica. I could put in here quotes from Rabbis but supporters of Israel and Judasim seem the type that would ignore them in order to cling to their erroneous beliefs.

    BTW, you will not hear a rabbi call himself an Israelite. Why not??? Because they hate the WHITE Isrealites with a passion equal to the Jews’ “racism.” They know they are a breed, not a race and that judaism is codified law, and not a religion per se although it has been “religionized”.

    Also, the Semites are the Arabs, descendants of Ishmael, the son of Abraham and Haggar. Anti-semite is just a trigger term invented by Jews to belittle non-Jews that do not like what the Jews do.

    Study. Do some research rather than spouting back the propaganda pushed on us for the past two millennia, and massively for the past 40 to 50 years.

    Get the facts and all of you except the brain dead will come to the facts as all do that research, obtain facts, and then accept facts as truth, rather than defending lies with more lies. And, the fact is, Ashkenzim Jews are the most evil group, particularly the Zionists, that ever polluted mankind with their hatred and racism.

  24. June 30, 2010 at 09:12

    lol…the international community should be quicker to hold Israel to account for its actions. For far too long they have gotten away with breaking international law.

  25. boil
    September 2, 2010 at 01:11

    we are going to experience upheaval like we have never seen soon. and i for one , is glad…. blow the whole place up in the name of your myth….. bow down to the one you serve, you’re going to get what you deserve………………………..

  26. Richie
    October 20, 2010 at 03:49

    Well it go’s both ways, if that’s how they think of us then when it comes to the crunch we will slaughter them just the same. Personally I think the whole middle east should be glass.

  27. December 20, 2010 at 22:31

    There’s a new book out, by a Yeshiva student that attempts, on a Halachic basis, to counter the book’s claims. Read it here

  28. December 20, 2010 at 23:23

    A new book is out, that confronts the Torat HaMelech on Halachic basis. Here:- http://tinyurl.com/2e4pn3w

  1. November 9, 2009 at 23:55
  2. November 10, 2009 at 01:06
  3. November 10, 2009 at 22:54
  4. November 11, 2009 at 14:24
  5. November 13, 2009 at 03:42
  6. November 13, 2009 at 12:27
  7. November 14, 2009 at 01:29
  8. November 15, 2009 at 10:25
  9. November 19, 2009 at 11:41
  10. November 19, 2009 at 11:53
  11. November 24, 2009 at 11:06
  12. November 27, 2009 at 15:58
  13. November 30, 2009 at 02:57
  14. December 6, 2009 at 23:42
  15. December 8, 2009 at 11:47
  16. December 13, 2009 at 10:48
  17. December 13, 2009 at 12:36
  18. December 15, 2009 at 07:57
  19. December 15, 2009 at 12:14
  20. December 15, 2009 at 12:22
  21. December 16, 2009 at 03:09
  22. December 17, 2009 at 14:54
  23. December 21, 2009 at 07:32
  24. December 22, 2009 at 22:55
  25. December 22, 2009 at 22:57
  26. January 3, 2010 at 14:03
  27. January 12, 2010 at 09:50
  28. January 31, 2010 at 01:23
  29. March 22, 2010 at 11:07
  30. March 24, 2010 at 02:38
  31. March 26, 2010 at 12:38
  32. April 5, 2010 at 23:15
  33. April 5, 2010 at 23:27
  34. April 5, 2010 at 23:27
  35. April 9, 2010 at 17:46
  36. April 13, 2010 at 19:25
  37. May 13, 2010 at 20:50
  38. May 14, 2010 at 00:22
  39. May 19, 2010 at 09:14
  40. May 29, 2010 at 11:43
  41. July 4, 2010 at 13:19
  42. August 30, 2010 at 23:06
  43. August 31, 2010 at 11:12
  44. August 31, 2010 at 11:29
  45. August 31, 2010 at 11:48
  46. August 31, 2010 at 15:52
  47. August 31, 2010 at 18:13
  48. August 31, 2010 at 18:31
  49. September 1, 2010 at 10:52
  50. September 1, 2010 at 14:28
  51. September 1, 2010 at 17:38
  52. September 1, 2010 at 18:33
  53. September 2, 2010 at 06:40
  54. September 4, 2010 at 16:23
  55. September 7, 2010 at 02:38
  56. September 7, 2010 at 12:12
  57. September 7, 2010 at 16:05
  58. September 7, 2010 at 16:19
  59. September 9, 2010 at 15:33
  60. September 19, 2010 at 07:52
  61. October 6, 2010 at 23:54
  62. October 18, 2010 at 16:12
  63. October 19, 2010 at 08:02
  64. November 11, 2010 at 01:05
  65. November 18, 2010 at 11:43
  66. January 27, 2011 at 13:19
  67. March 7, 2011 at 23:34
  68. May 5, 2011 at 20:52
  69. July 3, 2011 at 01:07
  70. August 15, 2011 at 11:40
  71. August 15, 2011 at 11:40
  72. October 1, 2011 at 20:11
  73. November 29, 2011 at 16:44
  74. November 30, 2011 at 18:11
  75. December 9, 2011 at 14:42
  76. December 9, 2011 at 19:19
  77. January 6, 2012 at 05:49

Leave a comment